The cost was about $100 per year for a set number of "feeds" and extra "feeds" cost extra money. At one point, I switched to a service called Web Pasties which offered this and several other neat services. I tried various methods using Java and JavaScript but all were too difficult or lacked something. The company seems to be out of business but the program may still be downloaded from several sites.ĭisplaying a rotating sequence of pictures that can be easily viewed but that will continue without user intervention is always interesting. It does a nice job of displaying pictures and is very easy to use although I have only tried it on small "jobs". This is more limited than Jalbum and does require Flash to be installed to work. Try looking at this slide show made using the program.Īnother interesting program I ran across is Fortop Album by Fortop Software. Purchasing removes the advertising slide. The free version simply adds an advertising screen to the end of the slide show. However it does a nice job of displaying pictures. Try the following to view albums displayed with Jalbum.Īnother interesting program I ran across is Flash Slideshow Maker by ANVSoft. The website has also recently been updated and improved. They now offer FREE space on the web to store your pictures with reasonably priced upgrades for more storage. If you have personal photos to process and display, give this program a try. I have been using Fotoplayer, FotoSlides and Turtle which means I must prepare and post the pictures three times! This is a waste of time and space so I have finally settled on the Turtle skin since it is offers a clean display with may options, is currently being developed and does NOT require FLASH. My only problem is deciding which skins to use. Changes in the main program occur as many user suggestions are incorporated into the design. The skins are constantly being improved and more are added. This program is FREE but has incredible support from the author and from others who use the program. It's a personal opinion, but my preference is to have a link to the various galleries always visible, both as an aide-memoire to show what services/galleries/subjects are available, and to allow a 1-click link.I have used Jalbum for a long time to prepare my hiking pictures for viewing. Once your are in a gallery and viewing an image, going back to a different gallery becomes a bit of a memory test in back-tracking. Having said that, the use could be simplified - I think it would just mean using less thumbnails. I would agree regarding the main section too - iframes with scrolling IMO don't work too well, they can lead to slightly confused displays, that get a bit difficult to navigate around - especially when accessibility is considered. along with the main header take up most of the display, with the first of the thumnails appearing at the bottom of the screen. The whole site seems to take up a considerable amount of space, but doesn't really use it that effectively. The header appears too big IMO too - it forces horizontal scrolling on the page, when it isn't necessary. The header cuts off on smaller monitors - and is not centred in the same way as the main bulk - so as the browser is reduced, the banner and main window centres become misaligned. These aren't meant to be overly-critical, just some personal views. While I just opted to use 100% width for the Jalbum frame, I could as easily have sized it to any dimension I wanted. Phil - I am using FF 3.6.3 as well, and yes, you do have to scroll vertically, but that's by design.Also, iframe is just an html tag that allows you to create a frame - it's useful when incorporating Jalbum into a website since iframe allows you to easily separate the Jalbum html (on my site, below the line) from the page's index.html (above the line). The usefulness of the "concept," as you call it, becomes clearer when I start adding other content outside of Jalbum. Niki - iframe just a way to separate the Jalbum html from the rest of the website. I do like the Turtle skin as well, having selected it after trying out many others. Jeff, good point - I might just remove it altogether, since that's where I plan to insert the links to yet-to be created pages. If you are going to use the copyright line, move it to the bottom. Which looks like you added, when you have a copyright watermark on the photo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |